Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 93 X posts from 83 X users, with an upper bound of 639,157 followers.

@KariTikkinen @tuuliel @hsfi @yletiede @SuomenAkatemia @STM_Uutiset En tiedä mikä näytön taso juuri tässä asiassa on, mutta systemaattisen katsauksen olemassaolo ei ole ainoa tai monissa tilanteissa edes paras mittari näytön tasolle. Ks. esim. https://t.co

@jompper @InhimillinenE Lisäksi vinoumaa ei edes ole mahdollista korjata meta-analyysissä. Ei siis oikeastaan ole todistettu ko. vaikutuksista mitään. https://t.co/wMoTaCXK8Q

@eplebel @richarddmorey @lakens See also van Elk et al. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1365. https://t.co/GvDE6iUeNF @dora_matzke @Vandekerckhove

@gvillejoubert @DataColada Yes. We issued a similar warning (https://t.co/9weDbKfaRw, from when I still believed in the Frontiers project). Garbage in, garbage out

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 89 additional X posts.