↓ Skip to main content

Further phenotypic delineation of subtelomeric (terminal) 4q deletion with emphasis on intracranial and reproductive anatomy

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Further phenotypic delineation of subtelomeric (terminal) 4q deletion with emphasis on intracranial and reproductive anatomy
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2007
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-2-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Scott Sills, MJ Burns, Laurinda D Parker, Lisa P Carroll, Lisa L Kephart, CS Dyer, Peter R Papenhausen, Jessica G Davis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,804,508
of 12,439,665 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#952
of 1,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,277
of 240,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,439,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.