You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional Ketosis Increases NAD+/NADH Ratio in Healthy Human Brain: An in Vivo Study by 31P-MRS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2018.00062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijing Xin, Özlem Ipek, Maurice Beaumont, Maya Shevlyakova, Nicolas Christinat, Mojgan Masoodi, Norman Greenberg, Rolf Gruetter, Bernard Cuenoud |
| Abstract |
Ketones represent an important alternative fuel for the brain under glucose hypo-metabolic conditions induced by neurological diseases or aging, however their metabolic consequences in healthy brain remain unclear. Here we report that ketones can increase the redox NAD+/NADH ratio in the resting brain of healthy young adults. As NAD is an important energetic and signaling metabolic modulator, these results provide mechanistic clues on how nutritional ketosis might contribute to the preservation of brain health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 8% |
| Canada | 12 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 96 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 172 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 14% |
| Scientists | 15 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#193,211
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#119
of 7,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,940
of 342,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.