↓ Skip to main content

High-mobility group box 1 induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates hepatic stellate cells

Overview of attention for article published in Laboratory Investigation, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-mobility group box 1 induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates hepatic stellate cells
Published in
Laboratory Investigation, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41374-018-0085-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin He, Yu Fu, Xiangming Ding, Dongxiao Li, Zi Wang, Dean Tian, Wei Yan

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a worldwide clinical issue. The activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) is the central event during the hepatic fibrotic response. However, the exact mechanisms related to HSC activation and the connection between hepatocytes and HSCs remain unclear. We elucidated the mechanism by which the nuclear-damage-associated molecular pattern molecule, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) was released from the impaired hepatocytes and induced endoplasmic reticulum stress to activate HSCs. In this work, we demonstrated that HMGB1 can be released from hepatocytes and the released HMGB1 activates the HSCs via ER stress at the transcriptional level which was dependent on the activation of both the TLR4 and RAGE signaling pathways rather than the TLR2 signaling pathway. HMGB1 induction of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 release was dependent on ER stress. In vivo, stable inhibition of HMGB1 suppressed liver fibrosis. These results suggest that under damage condition, HMGB1 can be secreted from injured hepatocytes and activates TLR4- and RAGE signaling pathways to induce ER stress which activates HSCs. Moreover, HMGB1 can produce multiple inflammatory mediators through ER stress, which, in turn, promote liver fibrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Investigation
#1,807
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,380
of 343,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Investigation
#38
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.