↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features, treatments and long-term follow-up outcomes of spinal chondroblastoma: report of 13 clinical cases in a single center

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features, treatments and long-term follow-up outcomes of spinal chondroblastoma: report of 13 clinical cases in a single center
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2935-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi Jia, Chao Liu, Jian Yang, Yong Ji, Haifeng Wei, Tielong Liu, Xinghai Yang, Cheng Yang, Jianru Xiao

Abstract

Chondroblastoma (CB) in the spine is extremely rare and there is little published information regarding this subject. We attempt to explore the clinical features of spinal CB and address the importance of total resection, especially total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for the treatment of spinal CB. Clinical data of 13 consecutive CB patients who received surgical treatment in our center between January 2006 and December 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. The 13 CB patients included 9 men and 4 women with a mean age of 32 years. The lesions were located in the cervical spine in 2 cases, thoracic spine in 5 cases, and lumbar spine in 6 cases. All the patients were treated surgically using either curettage, piecemeal total resection, or TES. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered in 2 cases. The mean follow-up period was 41.6 months. Relapse occurred in 3 (23.1%) cases, resulting in one death in 60 months. The mean RFS duration was 28.7 months. CB predominantly affects males and various age groups. Spinal CB more commonly involves the thoracic and lumbar segments. Spinal CB usually appears as an aggressive and destructive bony lesion with a soft tissue mass on imaging, forming compression on the spinal cord in some cases. Recurrence is not uncommon for spinal CB. Total resection, especially TES, has been confirmed as a powerful method to control the disease, while curettage is more likely to associate with local recurrence. Radiotherapy does not seem to reduce local recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 30%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 30%
Neuroscience 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,592
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,394
of 327,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#54
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.