↓ Skip to main content

Understanding rationales for acupuncture treated individuals’ beliefs in acupuncture effects, to be able to maximize therapeutic results: A qualitative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding rationales for acupuncture treated individuals’ beliefs in acupuncture effects, to be able to maximize therapeutic results: A qualitative analysis
Published in
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Enblom, Kristina Lagerstedt

Abstract

To investigate how individuals expressed rationales for their beliefs regarding efficacy of acupuncture. Qualitative data from participants of two different randomized sham-controlled trials, of relaxing (non-cancer volunteers of the general population) or antiemetic (patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy) effects of acupuncture was analyzed. Participants (n = 441) received genuine (n = 120 and n = 100) or sham (n = 121 and n = 100) (telescopic blunt sham-needle) relaxing or antiemetic acupuncture. The participants (n = 428; 97% response rate) expressed their belief regarding the efficacy of acupuncture, and n = 264 delivered qualitative rationales for their belief, analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Of the 428 participants, 35 (8%) believed entirely that the acupuncture was effective, 209 (49%) believed much, 136 (32%) believed moderately, 39 (9%) believed a little, and 9 (2%) did not believe that the acupuncture was effective. Five categories and seven subcategories represented the meaning units of the central message of the rationales for the treatment belief. Participants with positive beliefs (believed entirely/much, n = 244) presented rationales related to: "Experienced positive effects", "Knowledge regarding effect-mechanisms of acupuncture", and "General trustworthiness of acupuncture". Participants with more negative beliefs (believed a little or not, n = 48) presented rationales related to: "Lack of feasibility of the acupuncture", "Varying effects", and "The effect is individual, not available for everybody". In order to strengthen acupuncture treated patients' beliefs in the efficacy of acupuncture during clinical practice or research, acupuncture therapists may consider emphasizing these aspects in the therapeutic situation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Researcher 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Psychology 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 35%