↓ Skip to main content

How effective are on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How effective are on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13750-015-0044-5
Authors

Nicola P Randall, Louise M Donnison, Paul J Lewis, Katy L James

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Nepal 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,035,676
of 13,755,325 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#112
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,867
of 238,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them