↓ Skip to main content

The rising tide of opioid use and abuse: the role of the anesthesiologist

Overview of attention for article published in Perioperative Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 137)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rising tide of opioid use and abuse: the role of the anesthesiologist
Published in
Perioperative Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13741-018-0097-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena J. Koepke, Erin L. Manning, Timothy E. Miller, Arun Ganesh, David G. A. Williams, Michael W. Manning

Abstract

Opioid use has risen dramatically in the past three decades. In the USA, opioid overdose has become a leading cause of unintentional death, surpassing motor vehicle accidents. A patient's first exposure to opioids may be during the perioperative period, a time where anesthesiologists have a significant role in pain management. Almost all patients in the USA receive opioids during a surgical encounter. Opioids have many undesirable side effects, including potential for misuse, or opioid use disorder. Anesthesiologists and surgeons employ several methods to decrease unnecessary opioid use, opioid-related adverse events, and side effects in the perioperative period. Multimodal analgesia, enhanced recovery pathways, and regional anesthesia are key tools as we work towards optimal opioid stewardship and the ideal of effective analgesia without undesirable sequelae.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 16 21%
Other 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,121,306
of 14,556,971 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#13
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,814
of 274,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,556,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them