You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Archaeological Soybean (Glycine max) in East Asia: Does Size Matter?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gyoung-Ah Lee, Gary W. Crawford, Li Liu, Yuka Sasaki, Xuexiang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#988,531
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,679
of 225,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,038
of 155,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#126
of 2,678 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,678 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.