Title |
The evolutionary history of dogs in the Americas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.aao4776 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Máire Ní Leathlobhair, Angela R Perri, Evan K Irving-Pease, Kelsey E Witt, Anna Linderholm, James Haile, Ophelie Lebrasseur, Carly Ameen, Jeffrey Blick, Adam R Boyko, Selina Brace, Yahaira Nunes Cortes, Susan J Crockford, Alison Devault, Evangelos A Dimopoulos, Morley Eldridge, Jacob Enk, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Kevin Gori, Vaughan Grimes, Eric Guiry, Anders J Hansen, Ardern Hulme-Beaman, John Johnson, Andrew Kitchen, Aleksei K Kasparov, Young-Mi Kwon, Pavel A Nikolskiy, Carlos Peraza Lope, Aurélie Manin, Terrance Martin, Michael Meyer, Kelsey Noack Myers, Mark Omura, Jean-Marie Rouillard, Elena Y Pavlova, Paul Sciulli, Mikkel-Holger S Sinding, Andrea Strakova, Varvara V Ivanova, Christopher Widga, Eske Willerslev, Vladimir V Pitulko, Ian Barnes, M Thomas P Gilbert, Keith M Dobney, Ripan S Malhi, Elizabeth P Murchison, Greger Larson, Laurent A F Frantz |
Abstract |
Dogs were present in the Americas before the arrival of European colonists, but the origin and fate of these precontact dogs are largely unknown. We sequenced 71 mitochondrial and 7 nuclear genomes from ancient North American and Siberian dogs from time frames spanning ~9000 years. Our analysis indicates that American dogs were not derived from North American wolves. Instead, American dogs form a monophyletic lineage that likely originated in Siberia and dispersed into the Americas alongside people. After the arrival of Europeans, native American dogs almost completely disappeared, leaving a minimal genetic legacy in modern dog populations. The closest detectable extant lineage to precontact American dogs is the canine transmissible venereal tumor, a contagious cancer clone derived from an individual dog that lived up to 8000 years ago. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 72 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 23 | 8% |
Germany | 9 | 3% |
Canada | 7 | 3% |
Australia | 7 | 3% |
Spain | 5 | 2% |
Finland | 5 | 2% |
France | 4 | 1% |
Sweden | 3 | 1% |
Other | 36 | 13% |
Unknown | 105 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 181 | 66% |
Scientists | 80 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 322 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 21% |
Researcher | 51 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
Professor | 17 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 16% |
Unknown | 71 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 20 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 4% |
Other | 55 | 17% |
Unknown | 83 | 26% |