You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Tinnitus and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Hints for a Shared Pathophysiology?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Landgrebe, Ulrich Frick, Simone Hauser, Goeran Hajak, Berthold Langguth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,266,040
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,467
of 226,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,773
of 108,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#87
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.