↓ Skip to main content

A Preliminary Study of Health Literacy in an Ethnically Diverse University Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Preliminary Study of Health Literacy in an Ethnically Diverse University Sample
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0512-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunes Avci, Victoria M. Kordovski, Steven P. Woods

Abstract

There is a considerable body of research on health literacy in adult healthcare settings, mostly among at-risk clinical populations. However, much less is known about health literacy among youth transitioning to adulthood, including college students. Despite the protective effects of higher levels of education, some college students might have other risk factors for low health literacy (i.e., minority status). Hence, the purpose of the present study was to explore health literacy in an ethnically diverse public urban university. Although a majority of the students performed within the adequate range, we observed a subset of Hispanic and foreign students with lower health literacy, particularly in the domain of numeracy. Our preliminary results suggest that, contrary to common belief, there exists a vulnerable subpopulation of college students that have difficulty understanding and using health-related information. Health professionals should be alert to possible low health literacy among college students that may interfere with communication of vital health-related information and decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Lecturer 2 5%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,727,263
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#294
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,353
of 327,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.