↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Epidemiology of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hospital Outbreak Driven by a Contaminated Disinfectant-Soap Dispenser

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Epidemiology of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hospital Outbreak Driven by a Contaminated Disinfectant-Soap Dispenser
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Lanini, Silvia D'Arezzo, Vincenzo Puro, Lorena Martini, Francesco Imperi, Pierluca Piselli, Marco Montanaro, Simonetta Paoletti, Paolo Visca, Giuseppe Ippolito

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 14 11%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#104,216
of 223,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,484
of 120,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#591
of 1,323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.