You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does Holistic Processing Require a Large Brain? Insights From Honeybees and Wasps in Fine Visual Recognition Tasks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01313 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aurore Avarguès-Weber, Daniele d’Amaro, Marita Metzler, Valerie Finke, David Baracchi, Adrian G. Dyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
Japan | 3 | 6% |
Pakistan | 2 | 4% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 2 | 4% |
Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 32 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 47 | 89% |
Scientists | 5 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
Psychology | 7 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#346,645
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#711
of 34,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,215
of 343,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#20
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.