You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The pollinator crisis: What's best for bees
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/479164a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Levy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Monaco | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 81% |
| Scientists | 8 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 84 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#323,995
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#17,416
of 91,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,203
of 143,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#133
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.