↓ Skip to main content

The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12998-015-0069-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Søren O’Neill, Øystein Ødegaard-Olsen, Beate Søvde

Abstract

High-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain syndromes. The mechanisms by which HVLA-manipulation might reduce spinal pain are not well understood, but often assumed to relate to the reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. It is also possible however, that HVLA-manipulation involves a segmental or generalized inhibitory effect on nociception, irrespective of biomechanical function. In the current study it was investigated whether a local analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation on deep muscle pain could be detected, in healthy individuals. Local, para-spinal muscle pain was induced by injection of 0.5 ml sterile, hyper-tonic saline on two separate occasions 1 week apart. Immediately following the injection, treatment was administered as either a) HVLA-manipulation or b) placebo treatment, in a randomized cross-over design. Both interventions were conducted by an experienced chiropractor with minimum 6 years of clinical experience. Participants and the researcher collecting data were blinded to the treatment allocation. Pain scores following saline injection were measured by computerized visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (0-100 VAS, 1 Hz) and summarized as a) Pain duration, b) Maximum VAS, c) Time to maximum VAS and d) Summarized VAS (area under the curve). Data analysis was performed as two-way analysis of variance with treatment allocation and session number as explanatory variables. Twenty-nine healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years) participated, 13 women and 16 men. Complete data was available for 28 participants. Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant difference between active and placebo manipulation on any of the four pain measures. The current findings do not support the theory that HVLA-manipulation has a non-specific, reflex-mediated local or generalized analgesic effect on experimentally induced deep muscle pain. This in turn suggests, that any clinical analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation is likely related to the amelioration of a pre-existing painful problem, such as reduction of biomechanical dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 25%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 25%