You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large–Scale Movement and Reef Fidelity of Grey Reef Sharks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle R. Heupel, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Richard Fitzpatrick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Philippines | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Bahamas | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 24% |
| Researcher | 43 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 119 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,334,358
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#109,948
of 217,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,055
of 99,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#366
of 678 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 678 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.