You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cross-Clade Protective Immune Responses to Influenza Viruses with H5N1 HA and NA Elicited by an Influenza Virus-Like Particle
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001501 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rick A. Bright, Donald M. Carter, Corey J. Crevar, Franklin R. Toapanta, Jonathan D. Steckbeck, Kelly S. Cole, Niranjan M. Kumar, Peter Pushko, Gale Smith, Terrence M. Tumpey, Ted M. Ross |
Abstract |
Vaccination is a cost-effective counter-measure to the threat of seasonal or pandemic outbreaks of influenza. To address the need for improved influenza vaccines and alternatives to egg-based manufacturing, we have engineered an influenza virus-like particle (VLP) as a new generation of non-egg or non-mammalian cell culture-based candidate vaccine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
Engineering | 7 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,729,670
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,200
of 197,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,356
of 157,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.