↓ Skip to main content

Application of ultrasonography to high-tie and low-tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: technical notes

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of ultrasonography to high-tie and low-tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: technical notes
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6302-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiko Sadakari, Shuntaro Nagai, Vittoria Vanessa Velasquez, Kinuko Nagayoshi, Hayato Fujita, Kenoki Ohuchida, Tatsuya Manabe, Takao Ohtsuka, Masafumi Nakamura

Abstract

Two ligation techniques can be applied in laparoscopy for left-sided colorectal cancer: (1) high-tie (HT), transection at the level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA); and (2) low-tie (LT), transection below the IMA, at the level of superior rectal artery (SRA), preserving the left colic artery (LCA). However, even with preoperative images, it can still be a challenge to identify these structures due to intraoperative individual conditions. In this study, we assess the use intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) to aid us in identifying the IMA and its branches to the SRA, LCA, and sigmoid artery. We performed IOUS in 18 patients diagnosed with left-sided colorectal cancer. Preoperatively, a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) angiography was obtained in majority of the patients, to visualize the IMA and its branches. Two patients were contraindicated to receive a contrast study, hence, was unable to undergo 3D-CT angiography. The resected specimen was grossly examined for the study. The bifurcation types were identified and compared using different modalities: preoperative 3D-CT, IOUS, and gross examination of the resected specimen. The branching of the IMA revealed by IOUS was consistent to the findings preoperatively by the 3D-CT and postoperatively by the resected specimen. The IOUS result of the two patients without preoperative 3D-CT evaluation was also consistent with the post-operative bifurcation type. IOUS is an easy and feasible modality which aids in detecting the branching of the IMA during LT and HT ligation in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. It can serve as an adjunct modality for 3D-CT angiography and can also be considered a safe alternative option for cases wherein 3D-CT angiography is unavailable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,915,307
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,712
of 6,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,118
of 334,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#49
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.