You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0326-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore L. Roth, Cristina Puig-Saus, Ruby Yu, Eric Shifrut, Julia Carnevale, P. Jonathan Li, Joseph Hiatt, Justin Saco, Paige Krystofinski, Han Li, Victoria Tobin, David N. Nguyen, Michael R. Lee, Amy L. Putnam, Andrea L. Ferris, Jeff W. Chen, Jean-Nicolas Schickel, Laurence Pellerin, David Carmody, Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu, Daniela del Gaudio, Hiroyuki Matsumoto, Montse Morell, Ying Mao, Min Cho, Rolen M. Quadros, Channabasavaiah B. Gurumurthy, Baz Smith, Michael Haugwitz, Stephen H. Hughes, Jonathan S. Weissman, Kathrin Schumann, Jonathan H. Esensten, Andrew P. May, Alan Ashworth, Gary M. Kupfer, Siri Atma W. Greeley, Rosa Bacchetta, Eric Meffre, Maria Grazia Roncarolo, Neil Romberg, Kevan C. Herold, Antoni Ribas, Manuel D. Leonetti, Alexander Marson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 446 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 125 | 28% |
| Spain | 30 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 5% |
| Germany | 13 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 150 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 289 | 65% |
| Scientists | 132 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1561 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 350 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 310 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 134 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 126 | 8% |
| Other | 89 | 6% |
| Other | 203 | 13% |
| Unknown | 349 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 403 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 243 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 213 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 6% |
| Engineering | 60 | 4% |
| Other | 159 | 10% |
| Unknown | 386 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1006. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,327
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,633
of 98,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295
of 340,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#30
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.