↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Social-Economic Risk of Chinese Dual Land Use System Using Fuzzy AHP

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability (2071-1050), July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of Social-Economic Risk of Chinese Dual Land Use System Using Fuzzy AHP
Published in
Sustainability (2071-1050), July 2018
DOI 10.3390/su10072451
Authors

Hai-Min Lyu, Yong-Xia Wu, Jack Shen, An-Nan Zhou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 38%
Environmental Science 3 23%
Unspecified 3 23%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,530,251
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability (2071-1050)
#3,268
of 5,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,759
of 266,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability (2071-1050)
#257
of 607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.