↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Airborne Lidar Elevation Surfaces for Propagation of Coastal Inundation: The Importance of Hydrologic Connectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Airborne Lidar Elevation Surfaces for Propagation of Coastal Inundation: The Importance of Hydrologic Connectivity
Published in
Remote Sensing, September 2015
DOI 10.3390/rs70911695
Authors

Sandra Poppenga, Bruce Worstell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 33%
Environmental Science 8 27%
Engineering 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,683,002
of 6,338,840 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#889
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,535
of 195,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#73
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,338,840 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.