↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 Subtypes in India: Origin and Evolutionary History of the Predominant Subtype C

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 Subtypes in India: Origin and Evolutionary History of the Predominant Subtype C
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ujjwal Neogi, Irene Bontell, Anita Shet, Ayesha De Costa, Soham Gupta, Vishal Diwan, Ranbir S. Laishram, Ajay Wanchu, Udaykumar Ranga, Akhil C. Banerjea, Anders Sönnerborg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#901,046
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,287
of 194,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,067
of 164,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#179
of 3,988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.