↓ Skip to main content

A novel SLC9A1 mutation causes cerebellar ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Genetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel SLC9A1 mutation causes cerebellar ataxia
Published in
Journal of Human Genetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s10038-018-0488-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiro Iwama, Hitoshi Osaka, Takahiro Ikeda, Satomi Mitsuhashi, Satoko Miyatake, Atsushi Takata, Noriko Miyake, Shuichi Ito, Takeshi Mizuguchi, Naomichi Matsumoto

Abstract

The mammalian Na+/H+ exchanger isoform one (NHE1), encoded by Solute Carrier Family 9, member 1 (SLC9A1), consists of 12 membrane domains and a cytosolic C-terminal domain. NHE1 plays an important role in maintaining intracellular pH homeostasis by exchanging one intracellular proton for one extracellular sodium ion. Mice with a homozygous null mutation in Slc9a1 (Nhe1) exhibited ataxia, recurrent seizures, and selective neuronal cell death. In humans, three unrelated patients have been reported: a patient with a homozygous missense mutation in SLC9A1, c.913G>A (p.Gly305Arg), which caused Lichtenstein-Knorr syndrome characterized by cerebellar ataxia and sensorineural hearing loss, a patient with compound heterozygous mutations, c.1351A>C (p.Ile451Leu) and c.1585C>T (p.His529Tyr), which caused a neuromuscular disorder, and a patient with de novo mutation, c.796A>C (p.Asn266His) which associated multiple anomalies. In this study, using whole exome sequencing, we identified a novel homozygous SLC9A1 truncating mutation, c.862del (p.Ile288Serfs*9), in two affected siblings. The patients showed cerebellar ataxia but neither of them showed sensorineural hearing loss nor a neuromuscular phenotype. The main clinical feature was similar to Lichtenstein-Knorr syndrome but deafness may not be an essential phenotypic feature of SLC9A1 mutation. Our report expands the knowledge of clinical features of SLC9A1 mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,014,589
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Genetics
#1,149
of 1,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,452
of 296,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Genetics
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.