↓ Skip to main content

Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) aos 30 anos

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 2,040)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) aos 30 anos
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018236.09172018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jairnilson Silva Paim

Abstract

This article, which aims to explore questions relating to SUS at 30 and to dialogue with other studies, presents an overview of the positive drivers, the obstacles and the threats to Brazil's Unified Health System. It points to a lack of prioritizing the SUS on the part of the government, underfunding and attacks on the system made by capital's policies. The article also suggests that one of the most significant threats to SUS is the financialization of health, linked to the financial dominance. It concludes by arguing that the SUS is not consolidated, justifying alliances between democratic, popular and socialist forces, with new strategies, tactics and forms of organization to face up to the power of capital and its representatives in society and in the State.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 21%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Professor 11 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 103 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 13%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Psychology 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 112 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,284,881
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#18
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,465
of 342,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.