↓ Skip to main content

Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13287-018-0938-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Lopes, Ocean Setia, Afsha Aurshina, Shirley Liu, Haidi Hu, Toshihiko Isaji, Haiyang Liu, Tun Wang, Shun Ono, Xiangjiang Guo, Bogdan Yatsula, Jianming Guo, Yongquan Gu, Tulio Navarro, Alan Dardik

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes, preceding most diabetes-related amputations. DFUs require over US$9 billion for yearly treatment and are now a global public health issue. DFU occurs in the setting of ischemia, infection, neuropathy, and metabolic disorders that result in poor wound healing and poor treatment options. Recently, stem cell therapy has emerged as a new interventional strategy to treat DFU and appears to be safe and effective in both preclinical and clinical trials. However, variability in the stem cell type and origin, route and protocol for administration, and concomitant use of angioplasty confound easy interpretation and generalization of the results. The PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases were searched and 89 preclinical and clinical studies were selected for analysis. There was divergence between preclinical and clinical studies regarding stem cell type, origin, and delivery techniques. There was heterogeneous preclinical and clinical study design and few randomized clinical trials. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was employed in some studies but with differing protocols. Concomitant performance of angioplasty with stem cell therapy showed increased efficiency compared to either therapy alone. Stem cell therapy is an effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers and is currently used as an alternative to amputation for some patients without other options for revascularization. Concordance between preclinical and clinical studies may help design future randomized clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Master 19 8%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 83 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 90 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,925,846
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#242
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,735
of 325,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#10
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.