@SMLaughna @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @UofA_Arts @UofAResearch @UAlberta This is necessary to make possible an analysis of the risks-benefits when prescribing some types of medication. It is very disappointing that those talking about crit
@Eodun @Shora @LostTransposon Por si se quiere empezar a criticar otras cosas: https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@LauraFMcConnell @jonathanstea Where in the lists is this one? https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@Disabled_Les That is an important distinction. Then the question is how to know what is curing and what is harmful when talking about how to cure things, and how to get proper and transparent information about that. https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@PVehemente Claro. Y la fe, porque hemos tenido casi todxs fe total y ciega en vosotrxs lxs sanitarixs. Hasta que empezamos a leer ( y eso no es crítica personal, sino a un sistema de funcionamiento de ciertas cosas, del que sólo sois una parte): https://t
@too_invisible @Mrsth616 No se contradice con esto: https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@ExpatGamerDad @VicenteCN89 @Nopanaden @pgullon Pero las recomendaciones son suficientes? no es un tema de salud laboral y salud pública que haya medidas obligatorias de ventilación imprescindibles? Respecto a la desconfianza, un ej, un medicamento que se
@nb87120292 @LauraFMcConnell This is an interesting reading too: https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@emulenews @Uhandrea @deia_eus Eso es cierto. Pero también puede aprender cosas útiles que por algún motivo no se difunden mucho: https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@AnatoliDR @tylerblack32 @UmarN91 The issue, as I see it, is not if they work for some pple, but that the risk is huge (death) for an unknown random (failure of reporting deaths as possible side effect). Is this random risk worth any positive effect that
@SameiHuda @capeannsky @tylerblack32 Also, what is the age at which this medication is safe (or useful)? How has that been assesed? https://t.co/monwCutzLq
RT @kilnerevonnet: @transponderings @amobeirne @Ruth2729 @Bexcouper @Dr_Ellie @rcpsych Since scare stories are mentioned: https://t.co/monw…
@transponderings @amobeirne @Ruth2729 @Bexcouper @Dr_Ellie @rcpsych Since scare stories are mentioned: https://t.co/monwCutzLq Risk is random with these meds, so the question is about ethics: is a perceived and not proven life-enhancing effect worth lost l
@jonathanstea @Mike_D_42 @DavidBloomberg I would be thankful if psychiatry/psychiatrists can explain how the brain of people change enough from maybe 18-23 to 24 so effects of some medication go from toxic from beneficial. https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@robert_calvo @javierpadillab O hablar de la psicología funciona muy bien para no tener q hablar de los riesgos de los tratamientos standard actuales, repitiendo q no son la mejor solución, sin decir nunca por qué. No hace falta tener la solución buena pa
@christocasas Me ha parecido pertinente copiar este enlace dado este comentario: https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@EdgarArtacho @MirayLpez1 No sé si este discurso de multicausalidad para casi todo (especialmente en el mundo de la "suicidología", donde es tan popular por algún motivo) tiene como resultado ignorar lo mono-causal, ignorar riesgos. https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@justinbatstone @Dr_Ellie There is an issue with the safety of some meds that many people are not made aware of. It would be ethical to let people know about the risks, since we can not the read testimonies from those who didn´t survive them. https://t.co/
@juanjojambrina https://t.co/monwCutzLq https://t.co/0YZKWrQJPq Half of all suicides in Scotland between 2009 and 2015 involved individuals prescribed antidepressants in the 12 months to their death.
@Luismi_cervus Cuál ha de ser el grado de conciencia para poder afirmar que alguien ha decidido algo? Es ético seguir usando sin cuestionarlo el uso del verbo decidir cuando no se ha sido testigo de un hecho y median otros factores? https://t.co/monwCutzLq
@yavecesnieso @gatomuxaxo Dejo esto por aquí, porque no todo el mundo tuvo tanta suerte. https://t.co/monwCuLaCY
@mmisery En algún momento también se pensó que había magia con otros métodos, pero: https://t.co/monwCuLaCY
@Alvarez_Iniesta Se podría hacer un paralelismo muy claro con el tema de los antidepresivos, con la particularidad de que un tratamiento inútil es mejor que un tratamiento con muchos y diversos riesgos.https://t.co/monwCuLaCY
The restoring #study329 shamingly placed the participants at risk of physical and mental danger again. Such academic fraud is a disgrace, may the law provide more protection for young people's health and prevent similar instances in the future. https://t.c
RT @HenryRunamucker: Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omi…
Interesting work in the @bmj_latest (https://t.co/mI5NW3HtjS). "In our opinion, statistically significant or not, all relevant primary and secondary outcomes and harms outcomes should be explicitly reported". Seems like a good rule of thumb. Wonder where i
RT @Deedoherty2: When considering MAID (euthanasia) for #PSSD...perhaps Drs should be willing to support death by hunger strike outside the…
RT @HenryRunamucker: Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omi…
RT @Deedoherty2: When considering MAID (euthanasia) for #PSSD...perhaps Drs should be willing to support death by hunger strike outside the…
When considering MAID (euthanasia) for #PSSD...perhaps Drs should be willing to support death by hunger strike outside the HQ of the company making the drug that caused the condition, or the uni/hospital that condones practices like those Senator Kutcher e
RT @HenryRunamucker: Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omi…
RT @HenryRunamucker: Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omi…
RT @HenryRunamucker: Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omi…
Bizarre that an organization dedicated to "fighting misinformation" is promoting a guy who published a study which omitted safety information to make a drug for children look safe and effective when it wasn't: https://t.co/R1cLvaipon
@LucGrandpa @JustinTrudeau Also, through negotiation https://t.co/5K7x7OWQUC
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
RT @fsuzukipsy: 先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP…
先日の日本小児精神医学研究会第22回教育セミナー「子どものこころ臨床に抗うつ薬をどう使うか」で引用した文献をいくつか紹介していきます。 imipramineやparoxetineは青年期うつ病には無効。 https://t.co/spdtoZP0xj
@ZacMunn Catalin was a coauthor of #RestoringStudy329 https://t.co/aJySq85za9 #paroxetine
@AllenFrancesMD and @fgodlee published Restoring #Study329, our RIAT reanalysis of #GSK's ghostwritten misrepresentation of #paroxetine for adolescents https://t.co/aJySq85za9
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: TY @TrudoLemmens 'Disparity’ between false claims by #Pharma + paid MDs, & the truth (harms to children), led to crimi…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: TY @TrudoLemmens 'Disparity’ between false claims by #Pharma + paid MDs, & the truth (harms to children), led to crimi…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: TY @TrudoLemmens 'Disparity’ between false claims by #Pharma + paid MDs, & the truth (harms to children), led to crimi…
TY @TrudoLemmens 'Disparity’ between false claims by #Pharma + paid MDs, & the truth (harms to children), led to criminal charges against #Pharma, exposed here: https://t.co/ZaDoO9tOig Every author should also have been charged. "When someone shows you
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
Senator Stan Kutcher, just one co-author, is still kept busy with medically induced death. Requests for euthanasia may come from victims of this biomedical scandal against innocent children and young people and from it's ongoing legacy which continues
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing h…
A study in which disparity between claims of "safety" (by #Pharma + Pharma-paid researchers) & the real data showing harm, exposed here: https://t.co/ZaDoO9tOig led to criminal charges - against Pharma. But none of the authors were charged and many co
https://t.co/0cTJ4RBOL6 A well known example where full transparency of patient level data changed everything.
RT @drhalat: "The efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any pr…
RT @drhalat: "The efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any pr…
RT @drhalat: "The efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any pr…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adole…
Infamous #Study329 of #SSRIs in which #Pharma & its paid researchers covered up severe harms incl #suicide - in *adolescents.* Nice. Massive effort was undertaken by @JoannaLeNoury @DrDavidHealy @psychepi et al to expose this deceit: https://t.co/ZaDoO
@Deedoherty2 @CaulfieldTim @CityNewsOttawa @ScienceUpFirst @jonathanstea @heysciencesam @StanKutcher @MoriartyLab @picardonhealth @McGillOSS Oh terrific, Stan Kutcher is involved. Who better to battle misinformation than a guy who let pharma ghostwrite his
RT @WeCareAboutMH: Then 2 decades later, I learnt Smithkline Beecham suppressed data showing adolescents treated with SSRI antidepressant p…
Then 2 decades later, I learnt Smithkline Beecham suppressed data showing adolescents treated with SSRI antidepressant paroxetine were at higher risk of suicide. Aided by luminary scientists prepared to author the reports, they committed medical fraud. h
@FDAWhistleblow1 @US_FDA As a counter-example, here’s a publication of a study where the authors DID check the validity of the raw data for a controversial study and re-analyzed: https://t.co/LwoMuabBkn This type of work is supported by @RIATinitiative
@Sc0ttJenkins @Cass_caro @AndreaEleanorF1 @HighWireTalk Now if you want to actually support a claim that you're using to distract from your inability to show vaccines are dangerous as you claim then it's better to provide links rather than just waffle on w
RT @Dr_JohnSF: I reviewed this study a decade or two ago, and came to similar conclusions. My memory, without looking, is that 2 to 5% of a…
I reviewed this study a decade or two ago, and came to similar conclusions. My memory, without looking, is that 2 to 5% of adolescents given Paxil, are likely to experience suicidal agitation.
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence https://t.co/R1cLva0OwP Complete with video message from Dr. Jon Jureidini!
RT @Martin_Ploederl: When the Keller et al. (2001) study (Study 329) was debunked by Jureidini et al. (https://t.co/I6L2DVocGp). Do you kno…
RT @psychepi: Karen Dineen Wagner is President of AACAP https://t.co/bOSo2GC7WJ Stan Kutcher is a Canadian Senator https://t.co/btFv5sR0SM…
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence https://t.co/eLO2nAzylc - read this before you trust in big pharma again
@SciencePharmer @DaveMcDonna @KellyMartin02 @benzosarebad @jill_d35 @metejtme @jenharp7 @Elianok10 @Sc0ttJenkins @ClinpsychLucy Please read them and we can discuss the rest of evidence... https://t.co/7IHi3BfYGj https://t.co/amzh4w6sHa
@DrDavidHealy @hervemaison Avec le lien de l'étude "republiée" dans le @bmj_latest : https://t.co/uBQDEz9I1H
RT @DrEvgenyLegedin: #Study329 is a case of scientifuc fraud in psychiatry. GlaxoSmithKline hid the suicidal events in the group of teenag…
@maasvdn @NOS Heeft @GSK niet een vaccin tegen vuurwerkschade? “Ongeveer 40% van alle kinderen in de wereld heeft onlangs ten minste één GSK-vaccin gekregen ter bescherming tegen een potentieel levensbedreigende infectie.” Deze GSK: https://t.co/R1wCH8WED