You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Internet-Based Self-Management Compared with Usual Care in Asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0027108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor van der Meer, Wilbert B. van den Hout, Moira J. Bakker, Klaus F. Rabe, Peter J. Sterk, Willem J. J. Assendelft, Job Kievit, Jacob K. Sont |
| Abstract |
Effectiveness of Internet-based self-management in patients with asthma has been shown, but its cost-effectiveness is unknown. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of Internet-based asthma self-management compared with usual care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,482,591
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,221
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,483
of 142,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#595
of 2,600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.