↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006124.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin H Wilson, Aliu Sanni, David A Rix, Naeem A Soomro

Abstract

Waiting lists for kidney transplantation continue to grow and live organ donation has become more important as the number of brain stem dead cadaveric organ donors continues to fall. The major disincentive to potential kidney donors is the pain and morbidity associated with open surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 51 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 59 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,174,289
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,322
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,953
of 156,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.