↓ Skip to main content

Representational Switching by Dynamical Reorganization of Attractor Structure in a Network Model of the Prefrontal Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Representational Switching by Dynamical Reorganization of Attractor Structure in a Network Model of the Prefrontal Cortex
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichi Katori, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Naohiro Saito, Jun Tanji, Hajime Mushiake, Kazuyuki Aihara

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a crucial role in flexible cognitive behavior by representing task relevant information with its working memory. The working memory with sustained neural activity is described as a neural dynamical system composed of multiple attractors, each attractor of which corresponds to an active state of a cell assembly, representing a fragment of information. Recent studies have revealed that the PFC not only represents multiple sets of information but also switches multiple representations and transforms a set of information to another set depending on a given task context. This representational switching between different sets of information is possibly generated endogenously by flexible network dynamics but details of underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here we propose a dynamically reorganizable attractor network model based on certain internal changes in synaptic connectivity, or short-term plasticity. We construct a network model based on a spiking neuron model with dynamical synapses, which can qualitatively reproduce experimentally demonstrated representational switching in the PFC when a monkey was performing a goal-oriented action-planning task. The model holds multiple sets of information that are required for action planning before and after representational switching by reconfiguration of functional cell assemblies. Furthermore, we analyzed population dynamics of this model with a mean field model and show that the changes in cell assemblies' configuration correspond to those in attractor structure that can be viewed as a bifurcation process of the dynamical system. This dynamical reorganization of a neural network could be a key to uncovering the mechanism of flexible information processing in the PFC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 4%
Italy 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Japan 2 2%
France 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 92 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 32%
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 32%
Computer Science 20 18%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Psychology 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2011.
All research outputs
#14,337,104
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,947
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,194
of 155,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#69
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.