↓ Skip to main content

A novel non sense mutation in WDR62 causes autosomal recessive primary microcephaly: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel non sense mutation in WDR62 causes autosomal recessive primary microcephaly: a case report
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12881-018-0625-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imane Cherkaoui Jaouad, Abdelali Zrhidri, Wafaa Jdioui, Jaber Lyahyai, Laure Raymond, Grégory Egéa, Mohamed Taoudi, Said El Mouatassim, Abdelaziz Sefiani

Abstract

Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a rare genetically heterogeneous disorder of neurogenic brain development characterized by a reduced head circumference at birth with no remarkable anomalies of brain architecture and variable degrees of intellectual impairment. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in genetic disorders represent a major diagnostic challenge. Two patients, 11 and 9 years old, born from consanguineous parents, were referred to the department of medical genetics at the National Institute of Health in Rabat. The diagnosis of MCPH was made, based on reduced head circumference without brain architecture abnormalities. The two patients were subject to the whole-exome sequencing, which allowed to diagnose a novel homozygous mutation c.1027C > T; p.Gln343* in exon 8 of WDR62, a gene already known to be related to MCPH. Sanger sequencing confirmed the segregation of the mutation in the family. Our data expends the spectrum of mutations in WDR62 gene, proves the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of whole exome sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of genetically heterogeneous disorders such MCPH. Exome sequencing led to the rapid and cost-effective identification of a novel homozygous mutation in WDR62 gene, thereby facilitating genetic counseling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,566
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,206
of 340,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.