↓ Skip to main content

Blogging and Social Media for Mental Health Education and Advocacy: a Review for Psychiatrists

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blogging and Social Media for Mental Health Education and Advocacy: a Review for Psychiatrists
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11920-015-0629-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly S. Peek, Misty Richards, Owen Muir, Steven Richard Chan, Michael Caton, Carlene MacMillan

Abstract

We live in a digital age where information can be found instantaneously via the Internet. Studies have shown that consumers search for much of their medical information on the Internet, particularly utilizing blogs and social media platforms. As the mental health field is riddled with misinformation and stigma, this offers a unique opportunity for psychiatrists and mental health professionals to reach a broad audience for mental health education and advocacy. In this review, we discuss the various methods and techniques for blogging and social media. We then review the current recommendations for ethics and professionalism as well as make recommendations to strengthen our guidance in this new and evolving field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 10 6%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Psychology 22 14%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 54 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,755,466
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#421
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,596
of 269,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.