You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gluteal Tendinopathy: Integrating Pathomechanics and Clinical Features in Its Management.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2015.5829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Grimaldi, Angela Fearon |
| Abstract |
Synopsis Gluteal tendinopathy is now believed to be the primary local source of lateral hip pain, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome, previously referred to as trochanteric bursitis. This condition is prevalent, particularly in post-menopausal women, and has a considerable negative influence on quality of life. Improved prognosis and outcomes in the future for those with gluteal tendinopathy will be underpinned by advances in diagnostic testing, a clearer understanding of risk factors and co-morbidities, and evidence based management programs. High quality studies that meet these requirements are still lacking. This clinical commentary provides direction to assist the clinician with assessment and management of the patient with gluteal tendinopathy, based on currently limited available evidence on this condition and the wider tendon literature, in addition to the combined clinical experience of the authors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 17 Sep 2015. doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.5829. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 288 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 42 | 15% |
| United States | 37 | 13% |
| Spain | 23 | 8% |
| Australia | 23 | 8% |
| Brazil | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 217 | 75% |
| Scientists | 39 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 564 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 12% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 60 | 11% |
| Researcher | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 109 | 19% |
| Unknown | 143 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 169 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 28% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 4% |
| Unknown | 161 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#214,135
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#61
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,643
of 284,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.