↓ Skip to main content

Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and New-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and New-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Epidemiology, November 2018
DOI 10.1097/ede.0000000000000891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonios Douros, Devin Abrahami, Hui Yin, Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, Christel Renoux, Marie Hudson, Laurent Azoulay

Abstract

Case reports have suggested a link between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, antidiabetic drugs used as second- to third-line treatments, and incidence of rheumatoid arthritis. Since the DPP-4 enzyme is involved in several immunologic processes and possibly in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis, further research is warranted. This population-based study aimed to determine whether use of DPP-4 inhibitors is associated with incidence of rheumatoid arthritis. Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we conducted a cohort study among 144,603 patients with type 2 diabetes initiating antidiabetic drugs between 2007 and 2016. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident rheumatoid arthritis using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models, comparing use of DPP-4 inhibitors with use of other antidiabetic drugs. We imposed a 6-month exposure lag period for latency and diagnostic delays. Secondary analyses included assessment of the duration response relation and comparison with other second-line antidiabetic drugs, among others. During 567,169 person-years of follow-up, 464 patients were newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (crude incidence rate: 82 per 100,000/year). Compared with use of other antidiabetic drugs, use of DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis (82 versus 79 per 100,000/year; HR: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.3), with no evidence of duration-response relation. The results did not change after using second-line antidiabetic drugs as the comparator group. In this large population-based study, use of DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of incident rheumatoid arthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#1,730
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,411
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#19
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.