You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Homeostatic Imbalance between Apoptosis and Cell Renewal in the Liver of Premature Aging XpdTTD Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002346 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jung Yoon Park, Mi-Ook Cho, Shanique Leonard, Brent Calder, I. Saira Mian, Woo Ho Kim, Susan Wijnhoven, Harry van Steeg, James Mitchell, Gijsbertus T. J. van der Horst, Jan Hoeijmakers, Pinchas Cohen, Jan Vijg, Yousin Suh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Professor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,087
of 197,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,806
of 82,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#240
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.