You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12876-016-0468-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Y. Backes, L. M. G. Moons, J. D. van Bergeijk, L. Berk, F. ter Borg, P. C. J. ter Borg, S. G. Elias, J. M. J. Geesing, J. N. Groen, M. Hadithi, J. C. H. Hardwick, M. Kerkhof, M. J. J. Mangen, J. W. A. Straathof, R. Schröder, M. P. Schwartz, B. W. M. Spanier, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, F. H. J. Wolfhagen, A. D. Koch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 19% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 24% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,033,575
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#102
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,096
of 337,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.