You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chimerism in grapevines: implications for cultivar identity, ancestry and genetic improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001220100683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Franks, R. Botta, M. R. Thomas, J. Franks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,361
of 4,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,219
of 136,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#36
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.