↓ Skip to main content

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy after neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy after neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-2935-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susana Pereira, Filipa Fontes, Teresa Sonin, Teresa Dias, Maria Fragoso, José M. Castro-Lopes, Nuno Lunet

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to estimate the incidence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and to identify its main determinants and impact in patient-reported outcomes. We performed a prospective cohort study including 296 patients with incident breast cancer submitted to chemotherapy, followed for 1 year. Patients with incident CIPN were reevaluated 6 months after this diagnosis. Relative risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were computed to quantify the relation between different clinical characteristics and the occurrence of CIPN, using Poisson regression. The variation of patient-reported outcomes between baseline and 1-year follow-up assessments was compared between patients with and without CIPN. The cumulative incidence of CIPN in the first year after diagnosis was 28.7 % (95 % CI 23.8-34.1), and more than 80 % of the patients were still symptomatic after 6 months. Among the latter, there was a significant decrease in the median total neuropathy score, clinical version (7 versus 4) between the two periods. In multivariable analysis, the risk of CIPN was higher for treatment with docetaxel (cumulative doses ≤300 mg/m(2), RR = 6.96, 95 % CI 2.53-19.10; >300 mg/m(2), RR = 13.32; 95 % CI 4.11-43.14). Alcohol consumption and diabetes were not significantly associated with CIPN. There were no significant differences in the variation of patient-reported outcomes between the baseline and 1-year follow-up evaluations. CIPN was frequent in this contemporary cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients and was strongly associated with docetaxel-based regimens. Symptoms persisted for at least 6 months in most patients, but severity was low and CIPN had no impact on patient-reported outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,296,603
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,080
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,869
of 272,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#53
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.