↓ Skip to main content

Groundwater availability in the United States: the value of quantitative regional assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 432)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Groundwater availability in the United States: the value of quantitative regional assessments
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10040-015-1307-5
Authors

Kevin F. Dennehy, Thomas E. Reilly, William L. Cunningham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,612,928
of 12,225,271 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#36
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,934
of 246,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,225,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them