↓ Skip to main content

Is the clinical lipidomics a potential goldmine?

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the clinical lipidomics a potential goldmine?
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10565-018-9441-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linlin Zhang, Xianlin Han, Xiangdong Wang

Abstract

Clinical lipidomics is a new extension of lipidomics to study lipid profiles, pathways, and networks by characterizing and quantifying the complete lipid molecules in cells, biopsy, or body fluids of patients. It undoubtfully has more values if lipidomics can be integrated with the data of clinical proteomic, genomic, and phenomic profiles. A number of challenges, e.g., instability, specificity, and sensitivity, in lipidomics have to be faced and overcome before clinical application. The association of lipidomics data with gene expression and sequencing of lipid-specific proteins/enzymes should be furthermore clarified. Therefore, clinical lipidomics is expected to be more stable during handling, sensitive in response to changes, specific for diseases, efficient in data analyses, and standardized in measurements, in order to meet clinical needs. Clinical lipidomics will become a more important approach in clinical applications and will be the part of "natural" measures for early diagnosis and progress of disease. Thus, clinical lipidomics will be one of the most powerful approaches for disease-specific diagnosis and therapy, once the mystery of lipidomic profiles and metabolic enzymes is deciphered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,386,534
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#230
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,074
of 329,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.