You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies Part II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M. Freeman, Pamela B. Morris, Karen Aspry, Neil F. Gordon, Neal D. Barnard, Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Emilio Ros, Stephen Devries, James O’Keefe, Michael Miller, Dean Ornish, Kim A. Williams, Travis Batts, Robert J. Ostfeld, Sheldon Litwin, Monica Aggarwal, Andrea Werner, Kathleen Allen, Beth White, Penny Kris-Etherton |
| Abstract |
The potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits of many trending foods and dietary patterns are still incompletely understood, and scientific inquiry continues to evolve. In the meantime, however, a number of controversial dietary patterns, foods, and nutrients have received significant media attention and are mired by "hype." This second review addresses some of the more recent popular foods and dietary patterns that are recommended for CV health to provide clinicians with current information for patient discussions in the clinical setting. Specifically, this paper delves into dairy products, added sugars, legumes, coffee, tea, alcoholic beverages, energy drinks, mushrooms, fermented foods, seaweed, plant and marine-derived omega-3-fatty acids, and vitamin B12. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 365 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 27% |
| Spain | 43 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% |
| Mexico | 13 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 12 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Argentina | 6 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 112 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 233 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 66 | 18% |
| Scientists | 55 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 68 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 866. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#21,013
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#52
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#408
of 342,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#2
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.