You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When doing nothing is something. How task allocation strategies compromise between flexibility, efficiency, and inactive agents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioeconomics, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10818-015-9205-4 |
| Authors |
Daniel Charbonneau, Anna Dornhaus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 39% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#309,429
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioeconomics
#1
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,808
of 265,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioeconomics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them