You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s68764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J Clarke, Anne Forster |
| Abstract |
Stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability, the effects of which may be prolonged with physical, emotional, social, and financial consequences not only for those affected but also for their family and friends. Evidence for the effectiveness of stroke unit care and the benefits of thrombolysis have transformed treatment for people after stroke. Previously viewed nihilistically, stroke is now seen as a medical emergency with clear evidence-based care pathways from hospital admission to discharge. However, stroke remains a complex clinical condition that requires health professionals to work together to bring to bear their collective knowledge and specialist skills for the benefit of stroke survivors. Multidisciplinary team working is regarded as fundamental to delivering effective care across the stroke pathway. This paper discusses the contribution of team working in improving recovery at key points in the post-stroke pathway. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 540 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 121 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 15% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 13% |
| Unknown | 186 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 155 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 11% |
| Unknown | 195 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,637,065
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#59
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,389
of 276,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.