↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic adaptation to caloric restriction and subsequent refeeding: the Minnesota Starvation Experiment revisited 1 , 2

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
47 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
30 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic adaptation to caloric restriction and subsequent refeeding: the Minnesota Starvation Experiment revisited 1 , 2
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2015
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.115.109173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manfred James Müller, Janna Enderle, Maryam Pourhassan, Wiebke Braun, Benjamin Eggeling, Merit Lagerpusch, Claus-Christian Glüer, Joseph J Kehayias, Dieter Kiosz, Anja Bosy-Westphal

Abstract

Adaptive thermogenesis (AT) is the fat-free mass (FFM)-independent reduction of resting energy expenditure (REE) to caloric restriction (CR). AT attenuates weight loss and favors weight regain. Its variance, dynamics, and control remain obscure. Our aims were to address the variance and kinetics of AT, its associations with body composition in the context of endocrine determinants, and its effect on weight regain. Thirty-two nonobese men underwent sequential overfeeding (1 wk at +50% of energy needs), CR (3 wk at -50% of energy needs), and refeeding (2 wk at +50% of energy needs). AT and its determinants were measured together with body composition as assessed with the use of quantitative magnetic resonance, whole-body MRI, isotope dilution, and nitrogen and fluid balances. Changes in body weight were +1.8 kg (overfeeding), -6.0 kg (CR), and +3.5 kg (refeeding). CR reduced fat mass and FFM by 114 and 159 g/d, respectively. Within FFM, skeletal muscle (-5%), liver (-13%), and kidneys (-8%) decreased. CR also led to reductions in REE (-266 kcal/d), respiratory quotient (-15%), heart rate (-14%), blood pressure (-7%), creatinine clearance (-12%), energy cost of walking (-22%), activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) (-38%), and plasma leptin (-44%), insulin (-54%), adiponectin (-49%), 3,5,3'-tri-iodo-thyronine (T3) (-39%), and testosterone (-11%). AT was 108 kcal/d or 48% of the decrease in REE. Changes in FFM composition explained 36 kcal, which left 72 kcal/d for true AT. The decrease in AT became significant at ≤3 d of CR and was related to decreases in insulin secretion (r = 0.92, P < 0.001), heart rate (r = 0.60, P < 0.05), creatinine clearance (r = 0.79, P < 0.05), negative fluid balance (r = 0.51, P < 0.01), and the free water clearance rate (r = -0.90, P < 0.002). SNS activity and plasma leptin, ghrelin, and T3 and their changes with CR were not related to AT. During early weight loss, AT is associated with a fall in insulin secretion and body fluid balance. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01737034.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 385 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 28 7%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 116 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 13%
Sports and Recreations 48 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 127 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#72,796
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#243
of 12,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#818
of 287,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.