↓ Skip to main content

AR in VR: assessing surgical augmented reality visualizations in a steerable virtual reality environment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AR in VR: assessing surgical augmented reality visualizations in a steerable virtual reality environment
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11548-018-1825-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Hettig, Sandy Engelhardt, Christian Hansen, Gabriel Mistelbauer

Abstract

PURPOSE  : Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a promising approach to support surgeries; however, its application in real world scenarios is still very limited. Besides sophisticated registration tasks that need to be solved, surgical AR visualizations have not been studied in a standardized and comparative manner. To foster the development of future AR applications, a steerable framework is urgently needed to rapidly evaluate new visualization techniques, explore their individual parameter spaces and define relevant application scenarios. METHODS  : Inspired by its beneficial usage in the automotive industry, the underlying concept of virtual reality (VR) is capable of transforming complex real environments into controllable virtual ones. We present an interactive VR framework, called Augmented Visualization Box (AVB), in which visualizations for AR can be systematically investigated without explicitly performing an error-prone registration. As use case, a virtual laparoscopic scenario with anatomical surface models was created in a computer game engine. In a study with eleven surgeons, we analyzed this VR setting under different environmental factors and its applicability for a quantitative assessment of different AR overlay concepts. RESULTS  : According to the surgeons, the visual impression of the VR scene is mostly influenced by 2D surface details and lighting conditions. The AR evaluation shows that, depending on the visualization used and its capability to encode depth, 37% to 91% of the experts made wrong decisions, but were convinced of their correctness. These results show that surgeons have more confidence in their decisions, although they are wrong, when supported by AR visualizations. CONCLUSION  : With AVB, intraoperative situations are realistically simulated to quantitatively benchmark current AR overlay methods. Successful surgical task execution in an AR system can only be facilitated if visualizations are customized toward the surgical task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 6 8%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 22%
Engineering 12 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,862,323
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#160
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,216
of 330,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.