↓ Skip to main content

A psychoeducational group intervention for family and friends of youth with borderline personality disorder features: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A psychoeducational group intervention for family and friends of youth with borderline personality disorder features: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40479-018-0090-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Betts, Jessie Pearce, Ben McKechnie, Louise McCutcheon, Sue M. Cotton, Martina Jovev, Victoria Rayner, Mirra Seigerman, Carol Hulbert, Catharine McNab, Andrew M. Chanen

Abstract

Caring for a person with borderline personality disorder is associated with poor outcomes including elevated psychological distress and burden. This study will compare the effectiveness of two brief psychoeducational programs for carers of youth presenting for early intervention for borderline personality disorder features. The protocol for this study is presented here. The study is a single-centre parallel group, randomised controlled trial. As a family unit, relatives, partners and friends ('carers') are randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms to receive either an online borderline personality disorder psychoeducation program, or both the online psychoeducation group and a face-to-face group program, Making Sense of Borderline Personality Disorder. Carers are assessed at baseline and follow-up (4 weeks after the intervention). It is expected that participants who received the combined group and online programs will have better outcomes than those who received the online program alone. The primary outcome is carer burden, assessed using the negative appraisal subscales of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory. Secondary outcomes include positive experiences of caregiving, coping, self-rated personality disorder knowledge, psychological distress, expressed emotion and quality of life. This will be the first published evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention for carers of youth with borderline personality disorder features using a randomised controlled trial design. The results have the potential to inform clinicians and carers about the effectiveness of brief interventions designed to support families and friends of young people with borderline personality disorder, and what medium those interventions should utilise. Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616000304437 on 08 March 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 29 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 30 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,094,752
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#73
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,214
of 330,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.