↓ Skip to main content

Mass Loss of Totten and Moscow University Glaciers, East Antarctica, Using Regionally Optimized GRACE Mascons

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
250 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mass Loss of Totten and Moscow University Glaciers, East Antarctica, Using Regionally Optimized GRACE Mascons
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, July 2018
DOI 10.1029/2018gl078173
Authors

Yara Mohajerani, Isabella Velicogna, Eric Rignot

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 31%
Researcher 15 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 62%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Physics and Astronomy 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 238. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#76,566
of 16,267,118 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#207
of 16,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,590
of 280,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#7
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,267,118 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.