You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimating the size of European rabbits consumed by predators: Relationship between body mass and tooth dimensions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mammal Research, March 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03194270 |
Authors |
Javier Calzada, Daniel T. Haydon, Francisco Palomares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
India | 3 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 124 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 40 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 62% |
Environmental Science | 30 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 19 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#480
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,432
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.