The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marvels of illusion: illusion and perception in the art of Salvador Dali
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00496 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susana Martinez-Conde, Dave Conley, Hank Hine, Joan Kropf, Peter Tush, Andrea Ayala, Stephen L. Macknik |
| Abstract |
The surrealist movement aimed to blur the distinction between the real and the imagined. Such lack of a border between demonstrable truth and fantasy is perhaps most apparent in the art of Spanish painter Salvador Dali (1904-1989). Dali included numerous illusions in his artworks, with the intent to challenge the viewers' perceptions of reality and to enable them to see beyond the surface. The "Marvels of Illusion" exhibit, shown at The Dali Museum in St. Petersburg, FL., from June 14 to October 12, 2014, showcased Dali paintings, prints and sculptures centered on illusory themes. Here, we review the significance of illusions in Dali's art, focusing on the pieces displayed at the "Marvels of Illusion" exhibit. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,457,542
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,636
of 7,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,433
of 286,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#35
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.