↓ Skip to main content

Cryptosexuality and the Genetic Diversity Paradox in Coffee Rust, Hemileia vastatrix

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptosexuality and the Genetic Diversity Paradox in Coffee Rust, Hemileia vastatrix
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Roberto Carvalho, Ronaldo C. Fernandes, Guilherme Mendes Almeida Carvalho, Robert W. Barreto, Harry C. Evans

Abstract

Despite the fact that coffee rust was first investigated scientifically more than a century ago, and that the disease is one of the major constraints to coffee production--constantly changing the socio-economic and historical landscape of the crop--critical aspects of the life cycle of the pathogen, Hemileia vastatrix, remain unclear. The asexual urediniospores are regarded as the only functional propagule: theoretically, making H. vastatrix a clonal species. However, the well-documented emergence of new rust pathotypes and the breakdown in genetic resistance of coffee cultivars, present a paradox.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 46 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,922,559
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,991
of 209,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,613
of 144,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#677
of 2,638 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,638 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.